The next big market crisis will be caused by….

The short answer, unfortunately, is that no one can say for sure. But, we do have insight and a strong opinion about what will not cause the next crisis: toxic subprime loans and over-leveraged banks, whose downfall ultimately brought global financial system to its knees in 2008.

The reason we’re confident the next crisis will be caused by something other than toxic loans and a credit crunch is because history has repeatedly shown us that the causes of ‘the next crisis’ are almost never closely related to the causes of the ‘previous crisis.’ This ultimately makes sense, since investors and policy makers tend to respond to a crisis by implementing guardrails (laws and rules) and by putting new lines of defense in place in order to avoid a repeat catastrophe.

Examples from History: The Global Financial Crisis and the Dot Com Bubble

Dodd-Frank was the government’s legislative response to the 2008 global financial crisis, which among other things requires the country’s 35 largest banks to undergo annual “stress tests” to measure if they have sufficient capital to survive the combination of a recession, depressed housing prices, and double-digit unemployment.

Because of the new rules, banks are now required to have a minimum key capital ratio of 4.5%, they’ve added over $800 billion to balance sheets since 2008, and the Volcker Rule bars them from trading with depositor’s money.[1]

In other words, a great amount of effort has been made to ensure the next crisis doesn’t happen for the same reason as the last one.

This cycle is fairly predictable, in my view: policy-makers and investors tend to respond to crises by over-compensating with too much regulation or, in the case of investors, over-allocating away from the troubled sector in the wake of the downturn. This over-compensation, in my view, is what prevents crises from repeating themselves from cycle to cycle.

After 2008, I think it is safe to say that many investors not only sold out of stocks altogether, but many also shunned banks and financial stocks in portfolios. Both reactions would have been errors, in my view. In addition to missing out on the diversification benefits of investing in a sector as huge and critical as Financials, there are also the returns to consider: from April 2009 (end of the crisis) through July 2018, both Financials (as measured by XLF) and the S&P 500 are up approximately +230%.[2] As I see it, avoiding Financials after the crisis would not have been beneficial to the investor.

If we go back one crisis to the 2000 tech bubble, we recall that it was caused by completely different factors as the global financial crisis. In the tech bubble, euphoric investment sentiment drove up the P/E ratios of dot coms into the hundreds, even as many companies had no positive cash flow or signs of being able to generate it. We know today that it would have been a mistake to abandon solid technology companies in portfolios following the bubble, as technology stocks (as measured by XLK) actually outperformed the S&P 500 from October 2002 (when that bear ended) to October 2008 (when the new bear took hold).[3]

We could continue to go back in history and find different crises, different causes. The mini 1997 Asian Financial contagion was related to Emerging Market debt and the collapse of a currency (Thai baht); the crisis before that in 1990 was arguably tied to Iraq’s invasion of Kuwait and the subsequent spike in oil prices. And so on down the line of history.[4]

Bottom Line for Investors

We can’t say for sure where the next crisis will come from, but we’re pretty confident about what we can rule out. In other words, if you’re looking to big banks or trouble in the financial sector for the bogeyman that will break this bull, you’re probably looking in the wrong place.

Indeed, crises often emerge from factors, places or risks that investors don’t see, or ones they are just plain ignoring because there is too much focus on returns. The good news is that we do not see any such factors or risks looming imminently today, and we know where to keep looking for them – in places no one else is talking about.


1 The New York Times, June 21, 2018,
2 Yahoo Finance, August 28, 2018
3 Yahoo Finance, August 28, 2018
4 Wikipedia, August 28, 2018,


Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Inherent in any investment is the potential for loss.

Zacks Investment Management, Inc. is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Zacks Investment Research. Zacks Investment Management is an independent Registered Investment Advisory firm and acts as an investment manager for individuals and institutions. Zacks Investment Research is a provider of earnings data and other financial data to institutions and to individuals.

This material is being provided for informational purposes only and nothing herein constitutes investment, legal, accounting or tax advice, or a recommendation to buy, sell or hold a security. Do not act or rely upon the information and advice given in this publication without seeking the services of competent and professional legal, tax, or accounting counsel. Publication and distribution of this article is not intended to create, and the information contained herein does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment or strategy is suitable for a particular investor. It should not be assumed that any investments in securities, companies, sectors or markets identified and described were or will be profitable. All information is current as of the date of herein and is subject to change without notice. Any views or opinions expressed may not reflect those of the firm as a whole.

Any projections, targets, or estimates in this report are forward looking statements and are based on the firm’s research, analysis, and assumptions. Due to rapidly changing market conditions and the complexity of investment decisions, supplemental information and other sources may be required to make informed investment decisions based on your individual investment objectives and suitability specifications. All expressions of opinions are subject to change without notice. Clients should seek financial advice regarding the appropriateness of investing in any security or investment strategy discussed in this presentation.

Certain economic and market information contained herein has been obtained from published sources prepared by other parties. Zacks Investment Management does not assume any responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of such information. Further, no third party has assumed responsibility for independently verifying the information contained herein and accordingly no such persons make any representations with respect to the accuracy, completeness or reasonableness of the information provided herein. Unless otherwise indicated, market analysis and conclusions are based upon opinions or assumptions that Zacks Investment Management considers to be reasonable. Any investment inherently involves a high degree of risk, beyond any specific risks discussed herein.

It is not possible to invest directly in an index. Investors pursuing a strategy similar to an index may experience higher or lower returns, which will be reduced by fees and expenses.