The current economic recovery – which can now be deemed an economic expansion, in my view – has no historical precedent. All economic recoveries and expansions look different, of course. But we have never seen such a deep economic collapse followed immediately by a boom of this magnitude. It’s a first-of-its-kind event.

Take the economic recoveries from the 1990-1991, 2001, and 2007-2009 recessions, for example. In each of those downturns, companies slowly resumed the hiring process, reluctant in many cases to grow the labor force when demand and growth were only trickling back to life. Unemployment in each case remained high for years after the recession.1

Not the case today. Our portfolio management and research teams at Zacks Investment Management see stories every day of businesses struggling to bring on new workers, with reported shortages all over the labor markets. In the early stages of an economic recovery, there are typically too many workers seeking too few jobs. The opposite is true today.

Other fundamentals point to a recovery of never-before-seen magnitude. The rate at which workers quit their jobs – which signals worker confidence in the labor market – is the highest since before the bubble burst. American household debt-service burdens are at their lowest level since at least 1980. Personal savings reached records during the pandemic. Home prices have jumped 14% since February 2020. Businesses are scrambling to bring more production online, often facing input shortages in the process.

Many ‘experts’ predicted the pandemic would take years to recover from, but the reality is the U.S. economy may surpass its pre-pandemic size by the end of this quarter.

I think it is important to examine why this recovery looks so different from previous recoveries. Here are two reasons.

  1. Spurred by Event-Driven Forces, Not Cyclical Forces

Generally speaking, recessions historically are spurred by cyclical forces – rising interest rates, inflation, declining asset values, incomes, employment, or some structural issue in the credit markets, for example. Economic downturns tend to discourage consumers from spending and businesses from investing, exacerbating the weakness.

None of these conditions existed during the pandemic-induced (event-driven) recession and a bear market. Consumers and businesses went into defensive mode, but more out of fear of the virus versus fear that the economy was facing long-term damage. The federal government and the Federal Reserve provided extraordinary backstops, almost immediately, to keep businesses and consumers afloat. Many emerged stronger after the pandemic than before it.

There was a study performed in 2018 of New Orleans residents, in the years following Hurricane Katrina. The study examined individual tax returns and found that after a major hit initially, victims’ incomes recovered within a few years and even surpassed, on average, those of unaffected workers. In short, event-driven downturns can recover more quickly than cyclical downturns.

  1. Households and Businesses Were in Good Shape in February 2020

Event-driven bear markets and recessions can cause serious economic damage if households and businesses are in weak financial shape when the crisis occurs. We’re seeing this outcome across much of the developing world. But here in the U.S., households and businesses were in solid economic shape going into the pandemic, which set the table for a rapid recovery once the event risk faded.

What’s more, Americans were able to save money in record amounts during the downturn, thanks to government stimulus payments combined with business closures that essentially forced savings. U.S. households were saving at an annualized rate of $2.8 trillion in April 2021, which is two times higher than the savings rate before the crisis. By comparison, the annualized savings rate was $734 billion in June 2009 (following the Great Recession). Accumulated savings today amount to a wall of consumer liquidity poised to power the expansion.

Balance sheets for households and businesses are also historically strong. For households, the delinquent share of outstanding debt fell to 3.1% in Q1 2021, which is the lowest rate since records began in 1999. The ratio was 11.1% in 2009.

Banks also had strong capital positions entering the crisis. The New York Federal Reserve estimates that financial institutions have loss-absorbing capital equal to 16.5% of risk-weighted assets, which again is the highest share in over 20 years. When banks are well-capitalized and in strong financial shape, they are generally in good condition to lend, which is great for the economy.

Bottom Line for Investors

Many have been (pleasantly) surprised by the robust economic recovery thus far, and it appears the issues in the economy today are more about supply falling short of demand, which is a good problem to have, in my view. These imbalances (jobs, supply chain issues) should work themselves out in time.

Perhaps there should have been little surprise that the U.S. economy could deliver such a strong rebound in such little time, for the two reasons I detailed above. The same goes for the stock market – many wondered how the stocks could have delivered such strong returns in the midst of the crisis last year. The economy today should offer a clear explanation.


1 Wall Street Journal. June 2, 2021.


Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Inherent in any investment is the potential for loss.

Zacks Investment Management, Inc. is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Zacks Investment Research. Zacks Investment Management is an independent Registered Investment Advisory firm and acts as an investment manager for individuals and institutions. Zacks Investment Research is a provider of earnings data and other financial data to institutions and to individuals.

This material is being provided for informational purposes only and nothing herein constitutes investment, legal, accounting or tax advice, or a recommendation to buy, sell or hold a security. Do not act or rely upon the information and advice given in this publication without seeking the services of competent and professional legal, tax, or accounting counsel. Publication and distribution of this article is not intended to create, and the information contained herein does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment or strategy is suitable for a particular investor. It should not be assumed that any investments in securities, companies, sectors or markets identified and described were or will be profitable. All information is current as of the date of herein and is subject to change without notice. Any views or opinions expressed may not reflect those of the firm as a whole.

Any projections, targets, or estimates in this report are forward looking statements and are based on the firm’s research, analysis, and assumptions. Due to rapidly changing market conditions and the complexity of investment decisions, supplemental information and other sources may be required to make informed investment decisions based on your individual investment objectives and suitability specifications. All expressions of opinions are subject to change without notice. Clients should seek financial advice regarding the appropriateness of investing in any security or investment strategy discussed in this presentation.

Certain economic and market information contained herein has been obtained from published sources prepared by other parties. Zacks Investment Management does not assume any responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of such information. Further, no third party has assumed responsibility for independently verifying the information contained herein and accordingly no such persons make any representations with respect to the accuracy, completeness or reasonableness of the information provided herein. Unless otherwise indicated, market analysis and conclusions are based upon opinions or assumptions that Zacks Investment Management considers to be reasonable. Any investment inherently involves a high degree of risk, beyond any specific risks discussed herein.

The S&P 500 Index is a well-known, unmanaged index of the prices of 500 large-company common stocks, mainly blue-chip stocks, selected by Standard & Poor’s. The S&P 500 Index assumes reinvestment of dividends but does not reflect advisory fees. The volatility of the benchmark may be materially different from the individual performance obtained by a specific investor. An investor cannot invest directly in an index.

The Russell 1000 Growth Index is a well-known, unmanaged index of the prices of 1000 large-company growth common stocks selected by Russell. The Russell 1000 Growth Index assumes reinvestment of dividends but does not reflect advisory fees. An investor cannot invest directly in an index. The volatility of the benchmark may be materially different from the individual performance obtained by a specific investor.

Nasdaq Composite Index is the market capitalization-weighted index of over 3,300 common equities listed on the Nasdaq stock exchange. The types of securities in the index include American depositary receipts, common stocks, real estate investment trusts (REITs) and tracking stocks, as well as limited partnership interests. The index includes all Nasdaq-listed stocks that are not derivatives, preferred shares, funds, exchange-traded funds (ETFs) or debenture securities. An investor cannot invest directly in an index. The volatility of the benchmark may be materially different from the individual performance obtained by a specific investor.

The Dow Jones Industrial Average measures the daily stock market movements of 30 U.S. publicly-traded companies listed on the NASDAQ or the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE). The 30 publicly-owned companies are considered leaders in the United States economy. An investor cannot directly invest in an index. The volatility of the benchmark may be materially different from the individual performance obtained by a specific investor.