At any given time, there are always several impactful events happening at once in the global economy and the capital markets. Earnings reports, inflation readings, central bank decisions, trade deals, geopolitical chess moves with weighty implications. Taken together, all of these factors hold some sway over the direction of stocks and bonds, so it makes sense that investors would want to consider each one closely when making an investment forecast. Being analytic and detail-oriented makes sense, and is very worthwhile in my opinion.

But thorough analysis also poses a problem: in my opinion, investors too often overemphasize the negative, more fearful/worrisome factors, while giving less consideration to the pricing power of the positive factors. It’s human nature to be drawn to and captivated by uncertainties.

Indeed, we tend to care more about the factors/events/things that appear more ‘high stakes,’ more consequential, more uncertain. During the plague in London

in the mid-1600’s, for instance, people listened profoundly to the predictions of fortune tellers and fanatics, with prophecies and doomsday forecasts ruling the day. For people during that time, the risk of not listening and therefore paying the price was far too high.1 In other words, the sheer magnitude of uncertainty during that period forced many people to hedge against the worst-case scenario, as fanatic as that scenario may have been.

Here’s my point: historically, we see this pattern in the investment world during almost every business cycle, and it runs both ways. The dot com and cryptocurrency surges, for example, lured investors into the possibility of making huge sums of money quick, without any clear mechanism for understanding or measuring the risk of the investment. For some investors, the risk of not listening and not acting felt too high to pass up.

On the other side of greed you find fear and uncertainty, which can have a similar effect on investor psychology. Take the 2008 financial crisis, for example. In that year, the front page of the Wall St. Journal featured an article stating that economic decline, the collapse of the dollar, and moral degradation would lead to civil war in the United States by 2010.2 That’s just crazy, right?! Not to many people at the time. The gravity and hysteria surrounding the financial crisis gave many investors no choice but to take doomsday forecasts seriously.

In short, when the world feels most chaotic, just about any prediction can make sense. But many of those predictions are bad ones.

In my view, it all comes back to the same lesson long-time investors learn time and again (and again and again): investors are almost always better off ignoring the ‘get rich quick’ forecasts just as much as ignoring the doomsday ‘end of the world’ forecasts.

Stocks are volatile. Bull markets happen, bear markets happen. Sometimes it feels like sky is the limit for stocks, other times it feels like there is no way stocks can ever recover from the grips of a bear. But at the end of the day, and over long stretches of time, there have been instances of stocks moving higher in spite of all the good and the bad. We’ve long held that the key to success is the steady hand – a measured, disciplined approach taken over decades where equity exposure over long stretches of time is arguably the most important feature. History has shown that this strategy has the ability to work in the long run. The long-term investor who strips away the noise – who avoids the bad forecasts – is likely to achieve the most long-term success, in our view.

Bottom Line for Investors

At the start of every year, around twenty-two chief market strategists at major banks make a prediction for how the S&P 500 will perform in that year. Many investors put great faith in these forecasts, accepting them as truth upon announcement. But, we believe that past data suggests that they shouldn’t: the average difference between the market strategists’ forecasts and the actual performance of the S&P 500 is 14.7 percentage points per year.3 Wrong by double digits.

The bottom line for investors is not to avoid market forecasts, or to avoid making them yourself. It’s to remember that any prediction can sound right if the stakes are high or a situation feels important enough. Some may be right, some may be wrong. But, what matters most, in my view, is sifting through all the noise.

Disclosure

[1] Collaborative Fund, March 22, 2018, http://www.collaborativefund.com/blog/why-we-listen-to-bad-forecasts/

[2] Wall Street Journal - https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB123051100709638419

[3] Collaborative Fund, March 22, 2018, http://www.collaborativefund.com/blog/why-we-listen-to-bad-forecasts/

DISCLOSURE

Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Inherent in any investment is the potential for loss.

Zacks Investment Management, Inc. is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Zacks Investment Research. Zacks Investment Management is an independent Registered Investment Advisory firm and acts as an investment manager for individuals and institutions. Zacks Investment Research is a provider of earnings data and other financial data to institutions and to individuals.

This material is being provided for informational purposes only and nothing herein constitutes investment, legal, accounting or tax advice, or a recommendation to buy, sell or hold a security. Do not act or rely upon the information and advice given in this publication without seeking the services of competent and professional legal, tax, or accounting counsel. The information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable but we do not guarantee accuracy or completeness. Publication and distribution of this article is not intended to create, and the information contained herein does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment or strategy is suitable for a particular investor. It should not be assumed that any investments in securities, companies, sectors or markets identified and described were or will be profitable. All information is current as of the date of herein and is subject to change without notice. Any views or opinions expressed may not reflect those of the firm as a whole.

Any projections, targets, or estimates in this report are forward looking statements and are based on the firm’s research, analysis, and assumptions. Due to rapidly changing market conditions and the complexity of investment decisions, supplemental information and other sources may be required to make informed investment decisions based on your individual investment objectives and suitability specifications. All expressions of opinions are subject to change without notice. Clients should seek financial advice regarding the appropriateness of investing in any security or investment strategy discussed in this presentation.

Certain economic and market information contained herein has been obtained from published sources prepared by other parties. Zacks Investment Management does not assume any responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of such information. Further, no third party has assumed responsibility for independently verifying the information contained herein and accordingly no such persons make any representations with respect to the accuracy, completeness or reasonableness of the information provided herein. Unless otherwise indicated, market analysis and conclusions are based upon opinions or assumptions that Zacks Investment Management considers to be reasonable.

Any investment inherently involves a high degree of risk, beyond any specific risks discussed herein.