Stocks are generally not influenced by a single factor. It is usually a multitude of factors pushing and pulling prices at any given time. Earnings may serve as tailwinds breathing positive momentum into stocks, while tariffs could do the opposite and serve as headwinds. Leading economic indicators may boost investor sentiment and the relative attractiveness of stocks, while high valuations could discourage some investors from buying. At any given time, the confluence of these factors determines the direction of stock prices, in our view.

One such factor that gets little airtime, but that we’d like to discuss this week, is midterm elections. At Zacks Investment Management, we are politically agnostic in our approach to investing, favoring no party over the other. Our concern is on policy and how it may affect property rights, corporate profits, and economic growth. It doesn’t matter what side of the aisle it comes from – but it does matter.

Perhaps that’s why historically, stocks have tended to get jittery in midterm election years, as the balance of power in Washington undergoes a potential shift. Let’s look at some of the historical data first, and then we’ll explain why we think stocks have behaved this way in midterm election years.

Volatility in a Midterm Election Year: By the Numbers

Let’s start by taking a look at the last four midterm election years. The table below takes a look at S&P 500 corrections during years of midterm elections, but then also takes a look at what the market did in the 12 months following the correction[1]:

As you can see from the table, stocks have tended to display a volatile streak in midterm election years. Going back even further to 1962, the average correction during a midterm election year was an eyebrow raising -19%.[2]

But here’s the kicker: since 1962, the average bounce for stocks following the midterm correction was a sturdy +31%. The table also shows that in the last four midterm election years, stocks have rebounded considerably following the downside volatility enduring during the year.

Going even deeper, if we look at the average monthly returns of the S&P 500 in midterm election years (going back to 1962), we find that from April to September the S&P 500 has posted negative returns.[3]

Bottom line, stocks have tended to wobble, and we think there’s a reason why. Because midterm election years can mean a shift in the balance of power in Congress, it also means that there is an increased risk of one party enacting new laws and/or policies in the lead-up or once the power dynamic is set. Markets, in our view, do not like policy uncertainty.

But we see a flip side to this hypothesis – once midterm elections happen and the markets know how the table is set, so to speak, the uncertainty fades and corporations (stocks) have a better idea of what to expect from Congress in the coming two years. Perhaps this is why since 1946, the S&P 500 has not declined in the 12 months following a midterm election, with the average price return in the 12-month period following a midterm election from 1950 – 2014 being +15.3%. [4]

We do not think 2019 will be the exception.

Bottom Line for Investors

In my view, investors would be wise to brace for a noisy, sometimes ugly fight in this midterm election cycle, and we wouldn’t be surprised if markets responded with increased volatility – as has often been the case throughout recent history. But as we mentioned earlier, we do not believe stock prices are influenced by one factor alone. While the mudslinging surrounding midterm elections may create some headwinds for stocks, the positive news surrounding earnings, jobs, income, and spending may help support the longer-term upward trend. History has also shown that corrections in midterm election years are often followed by solid positive returns in the years that follow, and we could very well see that being the case in this cycle as well.


1 Strategas Quarterly Review in Charts, July 2, 2018, pages 55-58
2 Strategas Quarterly Review in Charts, July 2, 2018, pages 55-58
3 Strategas Quarterly Review in Charts, July 2, 2018, pages 55-58
4 Strategas Quarterly Review in Charts, July 2, 2018, pages 55-58


Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Inherent in any investment is the potential for loss.

Zacks Investment Management, Inc. is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Zacks Investment Research. Zacks Investment Management is an independent Registered Investment Advisory firm and acts as an investment manager for individuals and institutions. Zacks Investment Research is a provider of earnings data and other financial data to institutions and to individuals.

This material is being provided for informational purposes only and nothing herein constitutes investment, legal, accounting or tax advice, or a recommendation to buy, sell or hold a security. Do not act or rely upon the information and advice given in this publication without seeking the services of competent and professional legal, tax, or accounting counsel. Publication and distribution of this article is not intended to create, and the information contained herein does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment or strategy is suitable for a particular investor. It should not be assumed that any investments in securities, companies, sectors or markets identified and described were or will be profitable. All information is current as of the date of herein and is subject to change without notice. Any views or opinions expressed may not reflect those of the firm as a whole.

Any projections, targets, or estimates in this report are forward looking statements and are based on the firm’s research, analysis, and assumptions. Due to rapidly changing market conditions and the complexity of investment decisions, supplemental information and other sources may be required to make informed investment decisions based on your individual investment objectives and suitability specifications. All expressions of opinions are subject to change without notice. Clients should seek financial advice regarding the appropriateness of investing in any security or investment strategy discussed in this presentation.

Certain economic and market information contained herein has been obtained from published sources prepared by other parties. Zacks Investment Management does not assume any responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of such information. Further, no third party has assumed responsibility for independently verifying the information contained herein and accordingly no such persons make any representations with respect to the accuracy, completeness or reasonableness of the information provided herein. Unless otherwise indicated, market analysis and conclusions are based upon opinions or assumptions that Zacks Investment Management considers to be reasonable. Any investment inherently involves a high degree of risk, beyond any specific risks discussed herein.

It is not possible to invest directly in an index. Investors pursuing a strategy similar to an index may experience higher or lower returns, which will be reduced by fees and expenses.