The S&P 500 spent a single day in bear market territory on Christmas Eve, but since then the index has rewarded investors who didn’t panic. As I write this column, the S&P 500 has steadily rallied over +18% [1] off the bottom, and one category, in particular, has exhibited strong, noteworthy gains: cyclical stocks.[2]

Here’s what the data tells us. As you can see from the chart below, Industrials (IYJ), Financials (IYF), and Energy (IYE) have all outperformed the broad S&P 500 since the low on Christmas Eve. The Industrials sector is on pace to outperform the S&P 500 on a quarterly basis for the first time in over 5 years:

Cyclicals have outperformed the S&P 500 during the rally

Closing Price (Index) Data from 12/24/18 to 03/04/19, Source: Yahoo Finance

Why does this matter?

From a macro standpoint, cyclical stocks have historically been a useful gauge of investor confidence in the U.S. economy. Cyclicals tend to outperform early in economic cycles when investors are confident about the U.S. rebounding out of a recession and into a fresh growth cycle. Small-cap stocks also tend to outperform in this phase, for the same reasons.

But as economic cycles wear on and get ‘old,’ cyclicals often underperform as profitability wanes and growth rates slow. That’s technically where we’re supposed to be in this economic cycle – currently in its 10th year, with a recession “just around the corner.” But cyclical stocks appear to be telling us a different story.[3]

Investors may have been reassured by the Federal Reserve’s decision to pause rate increases, strong data in the labor market, and maybe some tailwinds from strong bank earnings and steady lending activity posted in Q4. Even if growth slows down as expected in 2019, cyclicals’ outperformance may be telling us that the chances of a recession this year are low. A good sign.

But in my opinion, there is a more important investment takeaway from this story.

Here it is: While tracking cyclicals may offer investors and market watchers some macro guidance, I would argue that when it comes to portfolio construction, investors would be better served determining their cyclical and non-cyclical exposure by focusing on individual company earnings – not on the macro environment.

In other words, I believe stock selection matters more than top-down decision making.

The idea that we should own cyclical stocks early in an economic cycle and then switch to a non-cyclical bias late in a cycle doesn’t hold water, in my view. At Zacks Investment Management, we want to buy and own companies that are consistently printing upward earnings estimates and/or have attractive valuations, as opposed to trying to time where we are in the business cycle. If you own quality and you own companies that grow earnings, that to me will add more value over time than shifting between sector and style based on timing the business cycle.

Bottom Line for Investors

If a cyclical stock is growing earnings and revising earnings higher on a consistent basis, my view is that it will do well no matter what ‘inning’ of the business cycle we’re in. The same applies to non-cyclical stocks or really any other equity category, in my view.

Macroeconomics matter, of course – knowing economic fundamentals can help an investor determine the earnings outlook for a particular sector or region, which may play directly into setting expectations for corporate bottom lines. But at the end of the day, the bottom line for investors is that it matters more, in my opinion, to construct a portfolio on a company-by-company basis based on bottom-up analysis of earnings and other fundamentals. That’s the approach that we find has worked for us here at Zacks Investment Management since the beginning.


1 Yahoo Finance, March 6, 2019.
2 The Wall Street Journal, February 24, 2019.
3 The Wall Street Journal, February 24, 2019.


Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Inherent in any investment is the potential for loss.

Zacks Investment Management, Inc. is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Zacks Investment Research. Zacks Investment Management is an independent Registered Investment Advisory firm and acts as an investment manager for individuals and institutions. Zacks Investment Research is a provider of earnings data and other financial data to institutions and to individuals.

This material is being provided for informational purposes only and nothing herein constitutes investment, legal, accounting or tax advice, or a recommendation to buy, sell or hold a security. Do not act or rely upon the information and advice given in this publication without seeking the services of competent and professional legal, tax, or accounting counsel. Publication and distribution of this article is not intended to create, and the information contained herein does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment or strategy is suitable for a particular investor. It should not be assumed that any investments in securities, companies, sectors or markets identified and described were or will be profitable. All information is current as of the date of herein and is subject to change without notice. Any views or opinions expressed may not reflect those of the firm as a whole.

Any projections, targets, or estimates in this report are forward looking statements and are based on the firm’s research, analysis, and assumptions. Due to rapidly changing market conditions and the complexity of investment decisions, supplemental information and other sources may be required to make informed investment decisions based on your individual investment objectives and suitability specifications. All expressions of opinions are subject to change without notice. Clients should seek financial advice regarding the appropriateness of investing in any security or investment strategy discussed in this presentation.

Certain economic and market information contained herein has been obtained from published sources prepared by other parties. Zacks Investment Management does not assume any responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of such information. Further, no third party has assumed responsibility for independently verifying the information contained herein and accordingly no such persons make any representations with respect to the accuracy, completeness or reasonableness of the information provided herein. Unless otherwise indicated, market analysis and conclusions are based upon opinions or assumptions that Zacks Investment Management considers to be reasonable. Any investment inherently involves a high degree of risk, beyond any specific risks discussed herein.

It is not possible to invest directly in an index. Investors pursuing a strategy similar to an index may experience higher or lower returns, which will be reduced by fees and expenses.